Write A Short Note On Tashkent Agreement

The declaration at the time concluded only the hostilities between India and Pakistan, but it still left the Kashmir issue open between the two, as neither side was able to reach an agreement to date. The Simla Agreement was signed in Shimla on July 3, 1972 as a treaty between India and Pakistan. Such a treaty took place after the war between India and Pakistan in 1971. The agreement included Indira Gandhi, Prime Minister of India, and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, the President of Pakistan. The main points of the agreement were as follows. The United Kingdom reflected a bias in favour of Pakistan. British Prime Minister Harold Wilson sent an identical note shortly after India began its move to Lahore to Ayub and Shastri: “Both governments bear responsibility for the constant escalation that took place thereafter, and today`s attack in the Lahore region presents us with a completely new situation.” His reference to Lahore indicated Britain`s preference. The deal has been criticized in India for not containing a non-war pact or a renunciation of guerrilla warfare in Kashmir. After the signing of the agreement, Indian Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri died mysteriously in Tashkent. [3] Shastri`s sudden death led to persistent conspiracy theories that he was poisoned.

[7] The Indian government refused to declassify a report on his death, saying it could harm foreign relations, cause disruption in the country and a violation of parliamentary privileges. [7] Absolutely in my personal opinion, India should under no circumstances sign the agreement for (1) it was Pakistan that invaded India and attacked it and. VI The Prime Minister of India and the President of Pakistan agreed to consider measures to restore economic and trade relations, communication and cultural exchanges between India and Pakistan and to take measures to implement the existing agreements between India and Pakistan. In accordance with the Tashkent Declaration, talks were held at the ministerial level on 1 and 2 March 1966. Despite the fact that these talks were unproductive, diplomatic exchanges continued throughout the spring and summer. No results were achieved from these talks because there were differences of opinion on the Kashmir issue. The news of the Tashkent declaration shocked the People of Pakistan, who expected more concessions from India than they received. Things deteriorated further when Ayub Khan declined to comment and isolated himself instead of announcing the reasons for signing the agreement. .